Case 2202706/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms. A Konieczny v Ocean Saver Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2202706/2020
- Decision date
- 15 September 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Walker
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms. A Konieczny
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy consent, the tribunal recorded that Ocean Saver Limited would pay Ms A Konieczny the sum of £2,900 net by way of breach of contract, payable no later than 28 September 2020. The judgment does not set out any disputed findings on that claim; it records the agreed payment only.
The tribunal also recorded that the Claimant's other complaint of unfair dismissal was dismissed on withdrawal. No separate liability findings, legal tests, or remedy split for the unfair dismissal claim are given in the judgment text supplied.
The written judgment is short and procedural. It records the agreement on the contract claim and the withdrawal of the unfair dismissal complaint, with the Employment Judge signing and sending the judgment to the parties on 18 September 2020.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | By consent, the Respondent agreed to pay the Claimant £2,900 net by way of breach of contract by 28 September 2020. | Settled | — | £2,900 |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the Claimant's other complaint of unfair dismissal was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,900
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.