Case 2202717/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr H Bassil v Payne Records Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2202717/2020
- Decision date
- 21 April 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wisby
- Venue
- London Central via CVP
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr H Bassil
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr H Bassil was employed by Payne Records Limited from 22 July 2019 to 21 April 2020. He was contracted to work 40 hours per week at £10.50 gross per hour, producing monthly gross pay of £1,820, and his wages were due at the end of each month in arrears. The tribunal had the employment contract, payslips, and bank deposit records before it. The respondent did not file an ET3, and the tribunal refused a postponement request from Mr Miguel Tello, who had said he was a director of the company and initially indicated he could attend.
The tribunal found that deposits made between October 2019 and March 2020 covered wages due for July, August and September 2019 only, leaving later wages outstanding. It also found that the claimant did not receive wages for October 2019 to February 2020, or for March 2020 and the three weeks worked in April 2020 before resignation. The claimant was not furloughed and no agreement for reduced hours had been made. On that basis, the tribunal declared unlawful deductions from wages and calculated £10,920 gross for October 2019 to March 2020 plus £1,260 gross for April 2020, making £12,180 gross owed.
The tribunal also found that the respondent failed to provide itemised pay statements for March and April 2020, contrary to section 8 Employment Rights Act 1996. The judgment records a single monetary order for £12,180 gross in respect of unpaid wages, with tax and national insurance to be accounted for to HMRC.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Tribunal declared unlawful deductions of £12,180 gross and ordered the respondent to pay £12,180 gross in respect of unpaid wages; it noted that income tax and national insurance would need to be accounted for to HMRC. | Upheld | — | £12,180 |
| Other | Tribunal declared that the respondent failed to provide written itemised pay statements for March and April 2020 under section 8 Employment Rights Act 1996. No separate monetary award was recorded for this finding. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £12,180
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 8 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.