Case 2202731/2020 · Employment Tribunal

Ms H Worrell v Warehouse Fashions Limited — 2021

Case reference: 2202731/2020
Decision date: 22 July 2021
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Hawksworth

Indexed: 19 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Ms H Worrell

Respondent

Warehouse Fashions Limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal struck out the claim of unfair dismissal only. It had previously written to the claimant on 22 January 2021 giving an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why that claim should not be struck out because it had no reasonable prospect of success.

The claimant failed to make written representations, failed to make sufficient representations, or failed to request a hearing. The tribunal therefore struck out the unfair dismissal claim. The judgment recorded that the breach of contract claim for notice pay and the claim for a protective award continued.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unfair dismissal	The judgment states that the claim of unfair dismissal only was struck out because the claimant failed to make representations, sufficient representations, or request a hearing after being given an opportunity to address why it should not be struck out as having no reasonable prospect of success. Claims for breach of contract (notice pay) and a protective award were stated to continue and were not adjudicated in this judgment.	Struck out	—	—

Legal tests applied

1 reference

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.