Case 2202733/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Dias v Royal Mail Group Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 2202733/2023
- Decision date
- 9 January 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Nicolle Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Dias
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claim under Rules 37(1)(c) and (d) of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution & Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The stated grounds were non-compliance with an Order of the Tribunal and/or that the claim had not been actively pursued.
The reasons record that the Claimant failed to respond to the Tribunal's letter dated 12 November. That letter asked whether the claim was being actively pursued and why the unfair dismissal claim should not be struck out in light of the Respondent's position that there was no dismissal because the contract had been reinstated after an internal appeal.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The unfair dismissal claim was struck out under Rules 37(1)(c) and (d) for non-compliance with a Tribunal order and/or because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rules 37(1)(c) and (d) of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution & Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.