Case 2202747/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr L Howard v Atalian Servest Security Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2202747/2022
- Decision date
- 15 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Joffe
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr L Howard
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy case management orders dated 3 May 2023, the Tribunal gave Mr Howard an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out. The stated reasons were that he had not complied with the Tribunal's orders dated 25 November 2022 and that the claim had not been actively pursued.
Mr Howard did not make any written representations and did not request a hearing. Employment Judge Joffe therefore struck out the claim. The judgment records no findings on the merits of the underlying complaints and no remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | The short judgment records that the claim was struck out in its entirety. This claim type is taken from the case context/listing because the judgment does not identify the pleaded causes separately. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The short judgment records that the claim was struck out in its entirety. This claim type is taken from the case context/listing because the judgment does not identify the pleaded causes separately. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.