Case 2202785/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms K Bugreeva v Drop Off London Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2202785/2019
- Decision date
- 21 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mr
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms K Bugreeva
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment. The respondent, Drop Off London Limited, failed to submit a response to the claim. The tribunal noted that Ms Bugreeva had set out clearly in boxes 8.2 and 9.2 the amounts claimed for unpaid wages of £600.00 and holiday pay of £64.00.
The tribunal also recorded that a Companies House search showed the respondent was still active. On that basis, judgment was entered for the claimant in the sum of £664.00, made up of the two amounts claimed.
The listed hearing on 22 November 2019 was cancelled as a result of the judgment being entered. The decision does not record any separate liability analysis beyond the Rule 21 default judgment process.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claimant stated this amount in box 8.2 as unpaid wages. The respondent filed no response, and judgment was entered under Rule 21. | Upheld | — | £600 |
| Holiday pay | The claimant stated this amount in box 9.2 as holiday pay. The respondent filed no response, and judgment was entered under Rule 21. | Upheld | — | £64 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £664
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21, Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.