Case 2202832/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr B Draghici v Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust London Central: by CVP on 18-20 April 2023 — 2023
- Case reference
- 2202832/2022
- Decision date
- 20 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Nicolle Non-legal
- Panel members
- Mr I McLaughlin, Mr P Alleyne
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr B Draghici
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the case remotely by CVP on 18-20 April 2023 before Employment Judge Nicolle with non-legal members Mr I McLaughlin and Mr P Alleyne. The Claimant, Mr B Draghici, appeared in person and the Respondent was represented by counsel.
In the judgment the tribunal recorded that the claims for direct disability discrimination and for an alleged failure by the Respondent to make reasonable adjustments on account of the Claimant's disability failed and were dismissed. Oral reasons were given to the parties on 20 April 2023, but no written reasons were provided in the extracted record.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states that the claim for direct disability discrimination failed and was dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states that the alleged failure to make reasonable adjustments on account of the Claimant's disability failed and was dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.