Case 2202840/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr JA Montero Marte v The Gobpsy Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2202840/2022
- Decision date
- 18 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wade Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr JA Montero Marte
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not file an ET3 Grounds of Resistance. Regional Employment Judge Wade therefore determined the claim on the ET1 under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013, without a hearing.
On that basis, the tribunal found that the respondent had unlawfully failed to pay wages and holiday pay to the claimant. It ordered payment of unpaid wages of £5,536.42 gross and sick pay of £96.35 gross.
The tribunal also ordered holiday pay of £1,953 gross. The total sum ordered was £7,585.77, and the respondent was directed to account to HMRC for any tax and National Insurance due on that sum.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the respondent had unlawfully failed to pay wages and awarded unpaid wages of £5,536.42 gross plus sick pay of £96.35 gross. | Upheld | — | £5,633 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had unlawfully failed to pay holiday pay and awarded £1,953 gross. | Upheld | — | £1,953 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,586
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.