Case 2202884/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. D. Ivanov v TDH Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2202884/2022
- Decision date
- 12 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge J Galbraith-Marten
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. D. Ivanov
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting alone, heard the claim in London Central by CVP on 12 August 2022. The respondent did not attend. The judgment records a single finding: the respondent made unlawful deductions from the claimant’s wages contrary to section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
The tribunal ordered TDH Limited (t/a Sun Studio.London) to pay Mr. D. Ivanov the gross sum of £8,230.00, subject to deductions for tax and national insurance. No separate breakdown of the award is given in the judgment, and no other claims or remedies are recorded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found unlawful deductions from wages contrary to section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and ordered payment of the gross sum of £8,230.00 subject to deductions for tax and national insurance. | Upheld | — | £8,230 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £8,230
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.