Case 2202899/2019 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Wrights of London Limited (in liquidation) — 2019
- Case reference
- 2202899/2019
- Decision date
- 10 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge E Burns Representation
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant worked at the respondent's restaurant from 18 September 2018 to 2 June 2019, first as a Sous Chef and then, from 4 January 2019, as Head Chef. The employment was under a contract dated 2 December 2018 with pay at £32,000 per annum and 28 days' holiday, and the tribunal found that the salary increased to about £36,000 from the promotion date. The respondent filed an ET3 but provided no substantive basis for resisting the claim, failed to comply with an order to provide information, and did not attend the hearing.
The tribunal accepted the claimant's bank records and found that the payslips produced by the respondent did not correspond with the payments actually made. It concluded that the claimant had been underpaid in three wage items totalling £1,083, including a £483 deposit deduction repayable on termination, a £200 deduction on 14 May 2019, and a £400 deduction on 31 May 2019. It also found that the respondent had not shown that the PAYE tax or employee national insurance deductions had been paid to HMRC, so those deductions were unlawful, subject to the respondent being able to prove payment to HMRC in satisfaction of that part of the order.
On holiday, the tribunal held that the Employee Handbook policy preventing carry-over did not apply because the claimant had not been given the handbook and it was not part of the contract. It found that he was entitled to payment in lieu of accrued untaken holiday from 2018 and a further five days for 2019 after rounding, and it assessed holiday pay at £1,307.70 gross. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £8,399.17 within 14 days, with the HMRC tax and NIC items treated as satisfied if the respondent could prove those sums had been paid over on the claimant's behalf.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal upheld the claim in respect of unpaid wage items and deductions from pay, including the £483 deposit deduction, £200 on 14 May 2019, £400 on 31 May 2019, and the PAYE and employee NIC deductions. The respondent did not attend or provide evidence that the HMRC items had been paid over; proof of such payment would satisfy the judgment for those items. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the claimant was entitled to payment in lieu of accrued untaken holiday. The Employee Handbook carry-over policy did not apply because it had not been provided to the claimant and was not part of the contract. The tribunal awarded holiday pay for 10 days accrued holiday, calculated at £1,307.70 gross. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £8,399
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.