Case 2202901/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Conan Security Ltd T/a Titan Security — 2019
- Case reference
- 2202901/2019
- Decision date
- 11 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JL Wade
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not file ET3 grounds of resistance. Employment Judge Wade decided the claim could properly be determined without a hearing under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
The tribunal held that the respondent had unlawfully failed to pay notice pay, holiday pay and wages to Mr MA Hasan Mazumder. It ordered payment of notice pay of £357.03, accrued holiday pay of £1,466.76 net, and unpaid wages of £357.03 net.
The judgment also directed that the respondent account to HMRC for any payments due in relation to the holiday pay and wages. The hearing listed for 12 December 2019 did not take place because judgment was issued on 11 December 2019.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £357 |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,467 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £357 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,181
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.