Case 2202960/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Arnold - Counsel v Ms Darwin - Counsel — 2020
- Case reference
- 2202960/2019
- Decision date
- 16 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge H Clark Representation
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Arnold - Counsel
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was an open preliminary hearing on whether the claimant was a disabled person for Equality Act 2010 purposes. The pleaded claims included sex-related harassment, victimisation, disability harassment, direct disability discrimination, discrimination arising from disability and constructive unfair dismissal, but those merits issues were not decided in this judgment. The tribunal heard evidence from the claimant, her mother, her boyfriend and other lay witnesses, together with the jointly instructed psychiatric expert, Dr Das.
The tribunal accepted that the claimant had mixed anxiety and depressive disorder and found that the impairment had begun in around November/December 2017, but it was not persuaded that the statutory threshold was met at that stage or for most of 2018. It rejected the submission that the condition was a progressive condition for section 8 purposes, and found limited evidence that the claimant's day-to-day activities were substantially affected while she was still working full time, commuting, socialising and travelling, including a Caribbean holiday in August 2018. It therefore did not accept that she was disabled from November 2017.
The tribunal held that the position changed in late November 2018, after the grievance and the claimant's first GP attendance for anxiety and panic attacks, when she was signed off sick with stress at work causing generalised anxiety. From that point, the impairment substantially affected drafting emails and proposals, socialising reliably and travelling on public transport, including rush-hour travel to work, and the tribunal found the effect could well last at least 12 months given the ongoing workplace issues. It concluded that the claimant was a disabled person with effect from about 27 November 2018.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Preliminary issue only: the tribunal found that the claimant was a disabled person for Equality Act 2010 purposes with effect from about 27 November 2018. The pleaded discrimination and constructive unfair dismissal claims were not determined in this judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
5 references- s.6 Equality Act 2010
- Schedule 1 Equality Act 2010
- Boyle v SCA Packaging Ltd ('could well happen')
- s.8 Equality Act 2010 progressive condition
- Rayner v Turning Point & Others
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.