Case 2202980/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Eade v City of London Corporation — 2019
- Case reference
- 2202980/2019
- Decision date
- 11 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Walker
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Eade
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a judgment on withdrawal under rule 52. The tribunal recorded that the complaint of discrimination where the protected characteristic is age was dismissed following a withdrawal by the claimant.
The judgment did not determine the remaining claims. It states only that the claimant’s remaining claims would proceed to a full merits hearing, so no substantive findings or remedy were recorded for those claims in this decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | The age discrimination complaint was dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant under rule 52. | Dismissed | Age | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 52
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.