Case 2203015/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Seherli v International Luxury Hotels Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2203015/2019
- Decision date
- 13 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge A Isaacson Representation
- Venue
- Central London
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Seherli
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the case at Central London on 12 and 13 February 2020 before Employment Judge A Isaacson. The claimant, Mr D Seherli, appeared in person and the respondent, International Luxury Hotels Limited, was represented by counsel.
The written judgment records a single outcome: the claimant's claim of unfair dismissal failed and was dismissed. No written reasons are included in the record provided, and the judgment notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing.
No monetary award is recorded in the judgment, and no separate remedy findings are set out in the written decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states only that the claimant's unfair dismissal claim failed and was dismissed. Written reasons were not provided in the written record because reasons were given orally at the hearing. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.