Case 2203043/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms A Kwarteng v DNA Cleaning Solutions Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2203043/2019
- Decision date
- 8 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms A Kwarteng
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a strike out judgment under rule 37. The tribunal recorded that by a letter dated 13 October 2021 the claimant was given an opportunity to confirm that she was ready to proceed to hearing, and that on 17 January 2022 she was given a further opportunity to make representations or request a hearing about why the claim should not be struck out for not being actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations in response to either letter and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the tribunal struck out the claim. The judgment does not record any substantive findings on the underlying merits of the claim, and it does not award any remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying substantive cause of action; it only records that the claim was struck out because it was not actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.