Case 2203044/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms M A Sekoni v DNA Cleaning Solutions Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2203044/2019
- Decision date
- 8 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms M A Sekoni
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn Ms M A Sekoni v DNA Cleaning Solutions Limited, the Employment Tribunal struck out the claim. The judgment records that the claimant was given an opportunity by letter dated 13 October 2021 to confirm that she was ready to proceed to hearing.
The tribunal then sent further opportunities on 17 January 2022 and 26 October 2022 for the claimant to make representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out for not being actively pursued. The claimant did not make any written representations in response to those letters and did not request a hearing.
Because no response was received to explain why the case should continue, the tribunal struck out the claim. The judgment does not record any substantive findings on the underlying employment complaint and does not award any remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The claim was struck out under rule 37 because it was not being actively pursued. The claimant was given opportunities by letters dated 13 October 2021, 17 January 2022, and 26 October 2022 to confirm readiness to proceed, make representations, or request a hearing, but did not do so. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.