Case 2203055/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Artefact Picture Framers Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2203055/2019
- Decision date
- 2 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JL Wade
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a rule 21 judgment because the respondent did not file ET3 Grounds of Resistance. Employment Judge JL Wade decided that the claim could properly be determined without a hearing on the ET1 material. The tribunal found that the respondent had unlawfully failed to pay the claimant redundancy pay and notice pay.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay a total of £11,251.38. That sum was made up of redundancy pay of £6,300 and notice pay of £4,951.38, described in the judgment as the net sum due. No separate findings on liability, remedy heads beyond those sums, or interest were recorded in the judgment.
The listed hearing for 5 February 2020 was vacated because judgment had already been given, and the parties were told not to attend.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £6,300 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment describes this as notice pay of the net sum due. | Upheld | — | £4,951 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £11,251
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.