Case 2203061/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms A. Yianoullou v Thomas Telford Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2203061/2019
- Decision date
- 1 May 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Andrew James
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms A. Yianoullou
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 29 April 2020 before Employment Judge Andrew James, the claimant withdrew her age discrimination claim, her health and safety related detriment/dismissal claim, and her associative discrimination claim. The judgment records that those claims were dismissed on withdrawal.
The tribunal stated that all other claims would proceed. The extracted text contains no merits findings on the withdrawn claims and no remedy award.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | The claimant withdrew this claim at the hearing; the judgment states it was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | Age | — |
| Other | The judgment refers to a health and safety related detriment/dismissal claim, which was withdrawn and dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | The claimant withdrew an associative discrimination claim; the judgment states it was dismissed on withdrawal. The protected characteristic is not identified in the extracted text. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.