Case 2203072/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v London Elizabeth Hotel (2014) Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 2203072/2019
- Decision date
- 20 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JL Wade
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a rule 21 judgment in which the respondent, London Elizabeth Hotel (2014) Ltd, did not file ET3 Grounds of Resistance. Employment Judge JL Wade considered the ET1 and decided that the claim could properly be determined without a hearing.
The tribunal held that the respondent had unlawfully failed to pay wages to the claimant, Ms E Schweikhardt-Lang. No separate legal test was identified in the judgment beyond the rule 21 determination process.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay wages of £1,104.25 to the claimant and to account for any tax due. The listed hearing on 17 January 2020 was vacated and the parties were told not to attend.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment; the tribunal found the respondent had unlawfully failed to pay wages and ordered payment of £1,104.25, plus accounting for any tax due. | Upheld | — | £1,104 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,104
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.