Case 2203085/2019 · Employment Tribunal
In person For v Not attendance — 2020
- Case reference
- 2203085/2019
- Decision date
- 14 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Adkin Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not attend the hearing. The tribunal heard oral evidence from the claimant, who was supported by a substantial bundle of documents, and used that evidence to assess the monetary claims. The claimant's updated schedule of loss sought £2,978, but the tribunal carried out its own calculation and reached a lower total.
The tribunal awarded £739.72 for unlawful deductions, assessed on the basis of nine days at £82.19 per day. It also awarded £1,109.57 for holiday pay, assessed on the basis of 13.5 days at £82.19 per day, with that daily rate derived from a salary of £30,000 per year.
A further £646 was awarded for financial losses described by the tribunal as arising under s.24(2) of the Employment Rights Act 1996. That figure comprised £80 for HSBC interest, £86 for a late rent penalty fee, £80 for a council tax summons, £50 for printing documents, and £350 for one week's lost wages, after the tribunal reduced that last item from the £625 claimed. The total awarded to the claimant was £2,495.29.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £740 |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,110 |
| Other | The tribunal described this head as financial losses arising under s.24(2) ERA 1996. It assessed the claimed items at £80 HSBC interest, £86 late rent penalty, £80 council tax summons, £50 printing costs, and £350 for one week's lost wages, reducing the last item from the £625 claimed. | Upheld | — | £646 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,495
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.24(2) ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.