Case 2203086/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Hall v Nextgenaccess Limited Heard via Cloud Video Platform (London Central) — 2021
- Case reference
- 2203086/2020
- Decision date
- 4 June 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Davidson
- Panel members
- Ms G Carpenter, Ms K Harr
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Hall
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a remote public hearing conducted via CVP on 1 to 4 June 2021 before Employment Judge Davidson, with Ms G Carpenter and Ms K Harr sitting as members, the tribunal heard evidence from Mr G Hall and Mr M Weller. The written record states that Mr Hall's complaint of disability discrimination succeeded.
The tribunal ordered Nextgenaccess Limited to pay Mr Hall £55,625. The award was made up of £15,000 for injury to feelings, £1,800 interest on injury to feelings, £32,500 for loss of earnings, £4,375 for the grossing-up element, and £1,950 interest on loss of earnings. The prescribed element was £4,500, attributable to the period May to November 2020, and the amount by which the monetary award exceeded the prescribed element was £51,125. The extracted judgment text does not set out fuller liability reasons beyond recording the successful disability discrimination complaint and the remedy awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | Disability | £55,625 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £55,625
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £36,875
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.