Case 2203098/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Emilia Maria Da Silva Batista v Estate of the late Veronica Janes Addison Cohen and 2 others — 2019
- Case reference
- 2203098/2019
- Decision date
- 20 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge H Clark
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
4 namedClaimant
Ms Emilia Maria Da Silva Batista
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the open preliminary hearing on 6 December 2019, Employment Judge H Clark considered the Respondents' strikeout application in relation to Ms Emilia Maria Da Silva Batista's claims against the estate and the executors of the late Mrs Cohen. The Tribunal did not strike out the case on the basis of employment status alone, noting that status was a nuanced issue and that there was insufficient evidence to decide against the Claimant at that stage.
The Tribunal then accepted the legal proposition that a personal contract ends by operation of law on death, and held that the Claimant had no reasonable prospects of showing that her employment was adopted or continued by the executors after Mrs Cohen's death in December 2017. It relied on the absence of any request for wages for about 16 months, the fact that the Claimant lived in the flat rent-free with utilities paid by the estate, and the documentary material showing that repairs, cleaning and preparation for sale were arranged by others rather than by the Claimant.
On that basis, the Tribunal struck out the Claimant's contention that she was dismissed in April 2019 and said the unfair dismissal claim was problematic because the death of an employer terminates the contract without a dismissal. It recorded that any claims the Claimant may have against Mrs Cohen as at December 2017 were unaffected, and that the redundancy payment and itemised payslips claims survived the strikeout, subject to later time-limit issues to be determined at another preliminary hearing.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal struck out the contention that the Claimant's employment continued after Mrs Cohen's death and held that the April 2019 unfair dismissal case had no reasonable prospects because death of an employer ends the contract without a dismissal. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
12 references- rule 37 no reasonable prospects
- Anyanwu v South Bank Student Union
- Balls v Downham Market High School & College
- Blockbuster Entertainment Ltd v James
- Tayside Public Transport Company Ltd (t/a Travel Dundee) v Reilly
- Romanowska v Aspirations Care Ltd
- QDOS Consulting Ltd & Ors v Swanson
- Hasan v Tesco Stores Ltd
- Farrow v Wilson
- s.136(5) ERA 1996
- s.174 ERA 1996
- s.218(4) ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.