Case 2203107/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms. P. Lewis, counsel v Mr Aaron MacZonis (Respondent’s husband) — 2020
- Case reference
- 2203107/2019
- Decision date
- 21 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mason Representation
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms. P. Lewis, counsel
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing in London Central on 16 January 2020 before Employment Judge Mason, the tribunal recorded that the Claimant's claims for unpaid holiday and for arrears of wages for 10 and 11 June 2019 were dismissed on withdrawal. The judgment also records that the Respondent's counterclaim for £280 in respect of excess holiday taken by the Claimant was dismissed on withdrawal.
The judgment states that the Claimant's claim of wrongful dismissal would proceed. No substantive finding on that claim is recorded in this judgment, and no remedy was assessed in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The Claimant's claim for unpaid holiday was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The Claimant's claim for arrears of wages for 10 and 11 June 2019 was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | The Respondent's counterclaim for £280 in respect of excess holiday taken by the Claimant was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.