Case 2203130/2013 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Cremin & Others named on the schedule v FM Conway & Aecom Limited and 1 other — 2022
- Case reference
- 2203130/2013
- Decision date
- 20 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Foxwell
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr J Cremin & Others named on the schedule
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal issued a strike-out warning letter on 16 September 2022 and gave the claimants an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claims should not be struck out because they had not been actively pursued. The claimants did not make representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
On that basis, Regional Employment Judge Foxwell struck out the claims. The judgment is procedural only and does not determine the merits of the underlying dispute. It also does not identify the substantive statutory claim type in the reasons, beyond listing the many linked case numbers and parties on the attached schedule.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying substantive claim type. By a letter dated 16 September 2022, the Tribunal invited representations or a hearing on strike-out for want of active pursuit; the claimants did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing, and the claims were struck out. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.