Case 2203137/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Foster v The Doctors Laboratory Ltd and 2 others — 2022
- Case reference
- 2203137/2020
- Decision date
- 16 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wade
Parties
4 namedClaimant
Mr J Foster
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a strike-out judgment rather than a determination on the merits. By email dated 29 September 2021, the Tribunal gave Mr J Foster an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Regional Employment Judge Wade held that the claim should be struck out. The judgment does not identify the substantive claims or make findings on their merits.
The decision was sent to the parties on 16 August 2022. No remedy was awarded and no monetary figures are recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive heads of claim. It records that the claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued and the claimant failed to make representations or request a hearing after the Tribunal's email dated 29 September 2021. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.