Case 2203163/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms De Morgado v Carolia Tower Ltd T/a Doubletree by Hilton Hotel – Tower of London — 2020
- Case reference
- 2203163/2019
- Decision date
- 23 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge E Burns
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms De Morgado
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that the claimant's complaints of direct disability discrimination under section 13 of the Equality Act 2010 and discrimination arising from disability under section 15 of the Equality Act 2010 were dismissed on withdrawal. No merits findings were made on those complaints in this judgment because they were withdrawn.
The tribunal noted that the claimant's remaining claims, as set out in the list of issues finalised at the preliminary hearing on 23 July 2020, would continue. This judgment therefore disposed only of the two disability discrimination complaints identified in the opening paragraph and did not determine the remainder of the case.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Direct disability discrimination claim under section 13 of the Equality Act 2010; dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Discrimination arising from disability claim under section 15 of the Equality Act 2010; dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 4 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.