Case 2203187/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr H Nassor v Moss Bros Group plc — 2022
- Case reference
- 2203187/2021
- Decision date
- 11 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Glennie Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr H Nassor
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure because it had not been actively pursued and the claimant had not complied with the tribunal's orders. The judgment records that case management orders were sent on 5 July 2021 and that the claimant did not comply with any of them.
The respondents applied for strike out by letter dated 22 October 2021, referring to the claimant's failure to comply with the tribunal's orders and to reply to correspondence. The tribunal wrote to the claimant on 26 October 2021 asking for any objections by 2 November 2021, but no reply was received. The tribunal concluded that a fair trial could no longer take place on 16 and 17 February 2022, vacated that hearing, and struck out the claim.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying substantive claim(s); it records that the claim was struck out under rule 37 for non-compliance and failure to actively pursue the case. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37 of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.