Case 2203189/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss L Mellor v v Oasis Fashions Limited (in administration) — 2022
- Case reference
- 2203189/2020
- Decision date
- 8 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hawksworth Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss L Mellor v
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant was employed by the respondent, which went into administration on 15 April 2020. She brought claims including a protective award, arrears of pay, holiday pay and notice pay. The respondent did not contest the protective award claim, and a separate judgment for a protective award had already been issued dated 28 January 2022.
At the video hearing on 18 July 2022, the claimant did not attend and was not represented. The tribunal accepted the information in her claim form that she was entitled to 12 weeks' notice, was not given notice or pay in lieu, and remained due 9 weeks' notice pay after a capped Redundancy Payments Service payment. It awarded £5,711.54 gross for breach of notice.
The tribunal also accepted that arrears of pay for 1 to 15 April 2020 and untaken holiday pay remained owing after capped Redundancy Payments Service payments. It ordered gross payments of £229.47 for arrears of pay and £1,012.64 for holiday pay, with payment of net sums permitted if tax and national insurance were properly accounted for.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim described as arrears of pay for 1 to 15 April 2020 after a capped payment by the Redundancy Payments Service. | Upheld | — | £229 |
| Holiday pay | Award for untaken holiday after a capped payment by the Redundancy Payments Service. | Upheld | — | £1,013 |
| Breach of contract | Claim described as notice pay and damages for breach of notice. The tribunal accepted the claimant was entitled to 12 weeks' notice and that 9 weeks' notice pay remained due after a capped payment by the Redundancy Payments Service. | Upheld | — | £5,712 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,954
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 rule 47
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.