Case 2203230/2025 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v No appearance or — 2025
- Case reference
- 2203230/2025
- Decision date
- 2 July 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Coen
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response to the claim had been presented, and the Tribunal proceeded under Rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Rules 2024. The Claimant brought claims for notice pay, unauthorised deductions from wages, holiday accrued but not taken on termination, and a statutory redundancy payment following termination on 31 January 2025.
The Tribunal held that the Claimant's claims succeeded. It ordered the Respondent to pay statutory redundancy pay, twelve weeks of unpaid notice pay, wages deducted for January 2025, and pay for 33 days of accrued but untaken holiday.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Statutory redundancy pay awarded as one week's pay for thirteen years and half a week's pay for one year. | Upheld | — | £9,450 |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay claim; the Tribunal awarded twelve weeks of unpaid notice pay. | Upheld | — | £10,385 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unauthorised deductions from wages between 1 January 2025 and 31 January 2025. | Upheld | — | £3,750 |
| Holiday pay | Holiday accrued but not taken on termination, calculated as 33 days at £173.08 per day. | Upheld | — | £5,712 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £29,296
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 22 Employment Tribunal Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.