Case 2203291/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss A Thompson v City and Suburban Services Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2203291/2020
- Decision date
- 22 April 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge P Klimov
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss A Thompson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss A Thompson succeeded in her unfair dismissal claim against City and Suburban Services Limited. Employment Judge P Klimov, sitting alone at London Central by CVP on 22 April 2021, recorded that the claimant was unfairly dismissed by the respondent.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had unreasonably failed to comply with the ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures, and directed that a 15% increase be applied to the compensatory award. The judgment does not set out separate basic and compensatory award figures in the written reasons.
The parties agreed the compensation figure, and the respondent was ordered to pay the claimant a total of £17,150.62. The written record states that this sum included the 15% ACAS uplift.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records a single unfair dismissal claim. The compensation figure was agreed by the parties and included a 15% uplift for the respondent's unreasonable failure to comply with the ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures. | Upheld | — | £17,151 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £17,151
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.