Case 2203299/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss B Ogrodowska v Mizkan Euro Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2203299/2020
- Decision date
- 16 December 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Stewart
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss B Ogrodowska
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss B Ogrodowska started work on 22 July 2019. The respondent accepted that she was disabled within the meaning of the Equality Act 2010 because she suffered from epilepsy. By letter dated 31 December 2019, the respondent confirmed that her employment would cease on that date and said she would be paid until 22 January 2020 as a gesture of goodwill. The tribunal found that the effective date of termination was 31 December 2019 and that the goodwill payment did not alter that date.
The claimant's discrimination complaints were a failure to make reasonable adjustments and discrimination arising from disability in relation to her dismissal, IT issues, planned brain surgery and the dismissal of her grievance. She also sought to amend to add breach of contract, but that amendment was refused as misconceived; the amendment concerning dismissal of the grievance was allowed. The tribunal held that the claims up to and including dismissal were out of time because, after the ACAS early conciliation period from 3 March 2020 to 17 April 2020, time expired on 17 May 2020. The grievance-dismissal complaint was treated as presented on 15 December 2020 when the amendment was allowed and was also out of time.
On the just and equitable issue, the tribunal accepted that the claimant had difficulty understanding the dismissal letter, was upset and depressed after dismissal, and later had a severe seizure in April 2020. It also noted that she had legal advice from April 2020 and could have presented the claim in time. Although the tribunal found that the short delay would not prejudice a fair trial, it concluded that it was not just and equitable to extend time. All claims were therefore struck out and the hearing listed for June 2021 was vacated.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Failure to make reasonable adjustments. The tribunal struck the claim out because it was out of time and it was not just and equitable to extend time. | Struck out | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Discrimination arising from disability relating to dismissal, IT issues, planned brain surgery and dismissal of the grievance. The grievance-dismissal complaint was treated as presented on 15 December 2020 when the amendment was allowed. The tribunal struck the claim out as out of time and declined to extend time. | Struck out | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
5 references- s.123 Equality Act 2010
- s.140B Equality Act 2010
- s.33 Limitation Act 1980 factors
- Galilee v Met Police (2018) ICR 634
- just and equitable extension under s.123 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.