Case 2203316/2020 · Employment Tribunal
MRS F NACONESKI BATTISTUZ v Trax Retail Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2203316/2020
- Decision date
- 3 December 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
MRS F NACONESKI BATTISTUZ
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at London Central on 1 to 3 December 2020 before Employment Judge M Emery sitting alone. The tribunal held that the claim of unfair dismissal was well founded and succeeded, and that the claim of wrongful dismissal was well founded and succeeded. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested.
The remedy section records full pay and loss of expenses of £523, health insurance of £164, furlough pay of £6,225 and pension contributions of £605.45. It also records wrongful dismissal damages of £4,080, a basic award of £1,614 and loss of statutory rights of £500. The subtotal before uplift was £13,711.45.
The tribunal then applied a 20% uplift for failure to follow the Code, quantified at £2,742.29, bringing the total award to £16,453.74. No discrimination claim, injury to feelings award or interest award is recorded in the judgment text supplied.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records full pay and loss of expenses of £523, health insurance of £164, furlough pay of £6,225, pension contributions of £605.45, a basic award of £1,614 and loss of statutory rights of £500. A 20% uplift of £2,742.29 was then applied for failure to follow the Code. The separate wrongful dismissal damages of £4,080 were recorded as a distinct head of loss. | Upheld | — | £12,374 |
| Wrongful dismissal | The tribunal awarded £4,080 for wrongful dismissal as a separate head of loss. | Upheld | — | £4,080 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £16,454
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £1,614
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £10,760
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.