Case 2203331/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms M Shaeri v Phasor Solutions Limited (in administration) Heard via Cloud Video Platform (London Central) — 2021
- Case reference
- 2203331/2020
- Decision date
- 21 October 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Davidson Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms M Shaeri
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis corrected judgment was sent on 21 October 2021 after a remote CVP hearing before Employment Judge Davidson. The respondent did not attend, and the parties had consented to the hearing being conducted remotely.
The tribunal recorded monetary awards to Ms M Shaeri for arrears of pay, arrears of pension, notice pay, holiday pay and a protective award. The arrears of pay, notice pay and holiday pay figures were stated net of sums already received from SRP.
The recorded sums were £4,521.55 for arrears of pay, £538.00 for arrears of pension, £5,712.00 for notice pay, £3,073.36 for holiday pay and £18,493.15 for a protective award based on 90 days' pay from 20 April 2020, making a total award of £32,338.06. The extracted judgment does not record separate figures for interest, injury to feelings, a basic award or a compensatory award.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Arrears of pay recorded at £7,500.01 less £2,978.46 received from SRP. | Upheld | — | £4,522 |
| Other | Arrears of pension recorded in the corrected judgment. | Upheld | — | £538 |
| Wrongful dismissal | Notice pay recorded at £6,250 less £538 received from SRP. | Upheld | — | £5,712 |
| Holiday pay | Holiday pay recorded at £4,903.85 less £1,830.49 received from SRP. | Upheld | — | £3,073 |
| Other | Protective award recorded as 90 days' pay from 20 April 2020. | Upheld | — | £18,493 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £32,338
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.