Case 2203338/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Anna Mkhitaryan v University College London and 3 others — 2025
- Case reference
- 2203338/2025
- Decision date
- 1 July 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge E Burns Representation
Parties
5 namedClaimant
Anna Mkhitaryan
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting at London Central by video on 27 June 2025 before Employment Judge E Burns, considered the Claimant’s application for interim relief under section 128 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 against the First Respondent, University College London. The Claimant represented herself and the Respondents were represented by counsel.
The judgment is limited to the interim relief application. It states that the application was not well founded and was dismissed. No further findings, underlying claim details, or factual reasons for the dismissal are set out in the extracted text.
No monetary award is recorded in the judgment. The decision was sent to the parties on 1 July 2025.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment records that the Claimant’s application for interim relief under section 128 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 against the First Respondent was not well founded and was dismissed. The underlying substantive claim is not identified in the extracted text. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.