Case 2203382/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Aziz Hassan — 2020
- Case reference
- 2203382/2019
- Decision date
- 23 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JL Wade
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a rule 21 judgment after the respondent failed to file ET3 grounds of resistance. Employment Judge JL Wade determined the claim on the ET1 without a hearing. The judgment states that the respondent unlawfully failed to pay redundancy pay, or alternatively had unfairly dismissed the claimant, and also failed to pay notice pay, wages and holiday pay. It further found that the respondent failed to provide a statement of reasons for the dismissal and unreasonably failed to comply with obligations under the ACAS Code of Practice.
The tribunal ordered statutory redundancy pay of £1,923.07, notice pay of £1,579.84, unpaid wages of £2,490.43 net, holiday pay of £391.96 net, and compensation of £961.54 for failure to provide written reasons. It also ordered an ACAS uplift of £1,277.06, giving a total award of £8,623.90. The hearing listed for 2 to 3 March 2020 was vacated and the parties were told not to attend.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The judgment states the respondent unlawfully failed to pay redundancy pay. Statutory redundancy pay was ordered at £1,923.07. | Upheld | — | £1,923 |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment uses the alternative wording 'or alternatively has unfairly dismissed' in relation to the termination. No separate award was itemised for this head. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay was awarded at £1,579.84. | Upheld | — | £1,580 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unpaid wages were awarded at £2,490.43 net. | Upheld | — | £2,490 |
| Holiday pay | Holiday pay was awarded at £391.96 net. | Upheld | — | £392 |
| Other | Compensation for failure to provide written reasons for dismissal was awarded at £961.54. The tribunal separately ordered an ACAS uplift of £1,277.06. | Upheld | — | £962 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £8,624
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.