Case 2203402/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Parker v Assima UK Ltd (in administration) — 2021
- Case reference
- 2203402/2019
- Decision date
- 2 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Parker
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn the written letter from the Claimant’s solicitor dated 2 March 2021, the case was limited to a claim for a basic award for unfair dismissal. The joint administrators consented to the proceedings continuing. The Respondents presented no evidence as to the true reason for the Claimant’s dismissal, which was a matter in dispute on the pleadings.
The Employment Tribunal therefore determined that the Claimant’s complaint of unfair dismissal was well-founded because the Respondents failed to prove a potentially fair reason for dismissal. The judgment does not record any separate finding on compensatory loss, as the case had been confined to the basic award.
The Tribunal awarded the Claimant a basic award of £13,125.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The written letter from the Claimant’s solicitor dated 2 March 2021 limited the case to a claim for a basic award for unfair dismissal. The Tribunal held that the complaint was well-founded because the Respondents failed to prove a potentially fair reason for dismissal. | Upheld | — | £13,125 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £13,125
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £13,125
- statutory, unfair dismissal
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.