Case 2203426/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. G Campo v Billionaire Retail (UK) Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2203426/2021
- Decision date
- 4 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wade Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. G Campo
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment after the respondent failed to file an ET3 Grounds of Resistance. Regional Employment Judge Wade determined the claim on the papers without a hearing.
The tribunal found that the respondent had unlawfully failed to pay the claimant wages owed to him. It ordered Billionaire Retail (UK) Ltd to pay Mr Campo £2,914.20.
The award was made up of £456.20 holiday pay and £2,458 notice pay. The tribunal also directed the respondent to account to HMRC for the tax and national insurance due on the amount.
The judgment states that the tribunal did not have jurisdiction to award compensation for the effect of the breach on the claimant, so no separate compensatory award was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Rule 21 judgment; the respondent did not file an ET3. The award was divided into £456.20 holiday pay and £2,458 notice pay, with directions to account to HMRC for tax and national insurance on the amount. | Upheld | — | £2,914 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,914
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.