Case 2203427/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Romancevics v Shindi Interiors Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 2203427/2019
- Decision date
- 17 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Davidson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr V Romancevics brought a claim against Shindi Interiors Ltd in case 2203427/2019. The judgment does not set out the substantive nature of the claim, but records that the matter was listed for hearing on 17 December 2019.
Neither party attended the hearing. Employment Judge Davidson states that the tribunal attempted without success to contact both parties to ascertain the reason for their non-attendance.
Pursuant to Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013, the tribunal struck out the claim because of the non-attendance of either party. No substantive findings on liability or remedy were made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying substantive claim type; it records only that the claim was struck out under Rule 47 because neither party attended the hearing listed for 17 December 2019. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.