Case 2203489/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms B Macedo v Privee Hospitality Ltd and 1 other — 2021
- Case reference
- 2203489/2021
- Decision date
- 17 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Baty JUDGMENT
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Ms B Macedo
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response to the claim was presented by either respondent. The tribunal therefore entered judgment under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules 2013, and the claimant's complaints of unlawful deduction from wages, in respect of notice pay, and sex discrimination succeeded.
The judgment did not set out any liability findings on the merits beyond the Rule 21 default basis. It directed that the hearing listed for 29 September 2021 would proceed to consider remedy, and stated that the respondents could attend that hearing but would only participate to the extent permitted by the Employment Judge hearing the case.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records that the claimant's complaint of unlawful deduction from wages, for notice pay, succeeded under Rule 21 because neither respondent presented a response. | Upheld | — | — |
| Sex discrimination | The judgment records that the claimant's sex discrimination complaint succeeded under Rule 21 because neither respondent presented a response. | Upheld | Sex | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunal Rules 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.