Claimant v ReelNRG Ltd — 2020

Case reference: 2203494/2019
Decision date: 20 February 2020
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge JL Wade

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Respondent

ReelNRG Ltd

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

ReelNRG Limited did not file ET3 Grounds of Resistance. Employment Judge JL Wade therefore considered the ET1 and determined the claim without a hearing under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.

The tribunal found that the respondent had unlawfully failed to pay the claimant wages, accrued holiday and expenses. It ordered payment of £3,600 in wages, £1,938 in holiday pay and £2,972.20 in expenses, and directed the respondent to account to HMRC for any payments due. The hearing listed for 21 February 2020 did not proceed because judgment had been given.

Claims and outcomes

3 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unlawful deduction from wages	The judgment ordered payment of wages of £3,600.	Upheld	—	£3,600
Holiday pay	The judgment ordered payment of holiday pay of £1,938.	Upheld	—	£1,938
Other	The judgment ordered payment of expenses of £2,972.20; it does not assign those expenses to a named statutory claim type.	Upheld	—	£2,972

Remedy

Monetary award

Total award: £8,510; across all upheld claims

Legal tests applied

1 reference

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.