Case 2203509/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Die With Your Boots On Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2203509/2019
- Decision date
- 27 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JL Wade
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not file ET3 Grounds of Resistance. Having considered the ET1, Employment Judge JL Wade decided that the claim could properly be determined without a hearing under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
The tribunal held that the respondent had unlawfully failed to pay wages to the claimant and ordered the respondent to pay compensation of £17,852.34. The judgment also states that the hearing listed for 26 February 2020 would not take place and the parties should not attend.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment; the respondent did not file ET3 Grounds of Resistance. The judgment records that the respondent unlawfully failed to pay wages to the claimant. It does not split the award between separate heads of claim. | Upheld | — | £17,852 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £17,852
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £17,852
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.