Case 2203512/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Ferreira v Securitas Security Services (UK) Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2203512/2019
- Decision date
- 20 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mason Representation
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a consent judgment given by Employment Judge Mason on 15 January 2020 at London Central. The tribunal recorded that terms of settlement had been agreed between the parties, and that the proceedings would be stayed until 19 February 2020 to allow those terms to be implemented.
The judgment did not contain any substantive findings on liability. It provided that if neither party applied to restore the matter to the hearing list before 19 February 2020, the claim would be treated as having been withdrawn on settlement by the claimant and would stand dismissed without further order. No monetary award was recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Consent judgment: terms of settlement had been agreed. The proceedings were stayed until 19 February 2020 to allow implementation; if neither party applied to restore the matter by that date, the claim would be treated as withdrawn on settlement by the claimant and stand dismissed without further order. | Settled | — | — |
| Redundancy | Consent judgment: terms of settlement had been agreed. The proceedings were stayed until 19 February 2020 to allow implementation; if neither party applied to restore the matter by that date, the claim would be treated as withdrawn on settlement by the claimant and stand dismissed without further order. | Settled | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.