Case 2203515/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Makou v James Lakeland Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2203515/2021
- Decision date
- 17 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Grewal Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs V Makou brought claims against James Lakeland Ltd for unfair dismissal, breach of contract, unauthorised deductions from wages, and claims under the Working Time Regulations 1998. Employment Judge Grewal heard the case at London Central by CVP on 15 February 2022.
The tribunal dismissed those four complaints in this judgment. The written record states only the outcome and does not set out separate detailed reasons in the extracted text provided. The judgment also records that reasons were given orally at the hearing.
A separate claim for redundancy pay was not determined on this occasion. The tribunal directed that the redundancy pay claim would be heard at a later hearing on 22 April 2022 at 10:00 a.m.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Working time regulations | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.