Case 2203533/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v P&A Trade & Services Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2203533/2019
- Decision date
- 10 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JL Wade
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not file ET3 Grounds of Resistance. Employment Judge JL Wade considered the ET1 and, under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013, determined that the claim could properly be decided without a hearing. The tribunal held that the respondent had unlawfully failed to pay the claimant wages, notice pay, holiday pay and redundancy pay.
The tribunal ordered payment of wages of £130.36, notice pay of £260.72, holiday pay of £138.91 and redundancy pay of £800, with the respondent to account to HMRC for tax and national insurance as necessary. The total monetary award was £1,329.99.
The judgment also states that the tribunal did not have jurisdiction to award compensation for "physical and mental abuse". The hearing listed for 12 March 2020 was vacated and the parties were told not to attend.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £130 |
| Breach of contract | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £261 |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £139 |
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £800 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,330
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.