Case 2203536/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Did not attend and was not represented For the v Westminster City Council and Ms A Farrell — 2020
- Case reference
- 2203536/2019
- Decision date
- 19 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge A James Representation
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Did not attend and was not represented For the
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 27 January 2020, Employment Judge A James considered documents supplied by the respondent, submissions from Mr C Kennedy, and the claimant's written submissions. The claimant did not attend and was not represented. The only claim identified in the judgment was a direct disability discrimination claim under section 13 of the Equality Act 2010.
The tribunal decided that the direct disability discrimination claim had no reasonable prospect of success and struck it out. As a result, the hearing listed for 17, 18 and 19 March 2020 was vacated. The written record notes that reasons had been given orally and that no further written reasons would be provided unless requested in time.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal held that the direct disability discrimination claim under section 13 Equality Act 2010 had no reasonable prospect of success and struck it out at the hearing on 27 January 2020. | Struck out | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.