Case 2203559/2019 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v ISS Facility Services Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2203559/2019
- Decision date
- 21 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge O Segal QC
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal considered whether the Claimant had been paid all salary due, whether pension contributions had been paid to the pension scheme provider, and the significance of a P45 apparently issued in error in 2019. The Claimant appeared in person and the Respondent did not attend, though it had provided a written statement and documents.
On salary, the Claimant accepted the Respondent's evidence that she had eventually been paid all salary due, while pointing out that some payments had been late. On pension contributions, the tribunal found clear evidence that no employer or employee contributions had been paid into the scheme since April 2018, despite deductions of £100.83 per month from the Claimant's salary from August 2019. The tribunal found this was a breach of contract and expected the Respondent to remedy it urgently, but made no award.
The tribunal accepted the Respondent's confirmation that the P45 sent on 18 September 2019 had been sent in error. On the Claimant's evidence, it found that she had continuity of employment from 2008, and that more than one TUPE transfer during that period had not affected her continuity.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The Claimant accepted that she had eventually been paid all salary due, although some payments had been made late. The judgment made no monetary award or express dismissal/upholding of this issue. | Other | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the Respondent had been in breach of the Claimant's contract in relation to pension contributions, but did not make a monetary award and noted the Claimant would be at liberty to claim in the civil courts if the situation was not remedied. | Upheld | — | — |
| Other | The tribunal determined, pursuant to s. 12 Employment Rights Act 1998 as stated in the judgment, that the Claimant had continuity of employment from 2008. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s. 12 Employment Rights Act 1998
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.