Case 2203565/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Onurcan v Malaysia PUBLIC PRELIMINARY HEARING — 2024
- Case reference
- 2203565/2021
- Decision date
- 23 August 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brown Appearances
- Venue
- Central London
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K Onurcan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a public preliminary hearing before Employment Judge Brown to determine whether the Claimant's claims against the Malaysian High Commission were barred by state immunity under the State Immunity Act 1978. The Claimant, a Driver employed since 2001 on the Locally Recruited Staff scheme, brought complaints of breach of contract and unlawful deductions from wages arising from a reduction of his salary scale from T18 to T14 following a Malaysian Ministry of Foreign Affairs review of locally recruited staff pay.
The Tribunal found that the Claimant's functions as a driver - including driving diplomats, members of the Malaysian royal family and senior officials, conveying sealed letters between missions, and accompanying (but not personally handling) diplomatic bags - were not sufficiently close to the exercise of sovereign authority to make his employment itself a sovereign act. The Tribunal considered Article 3 of the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations and concluded the Claimant's role was ancillary and supportive rather than governmental in character.
The Tribunal further held that, while any challenge to the Malaysian government's wholescale review of staff grades and pay would engage sovereign interests, a claim limited to breach of contract regarding the Claimant's individual contractual entitlement to a T18 grade does not, applying the approach in Benkharbouche. Accordingly, the breach of contract claim was held not to be barred by state immunity and was permitted to proceed to a further case management hearing.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Public preliminary hearing on state immunity only. The Tribunal held that the Claimant's employment was not an exercise of sovereign authority and that, insofar as the claim is limited to breach of contract regarding his grade and pay, it does not engage the state's sovereign interests and is not barred by state immunity. The claim was permitted to proceed; no substantive merits determination was made at this hearing. | Other | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Listed in the claim form alongside the breach of contract claim but not separately adjudicated at this preliminary hearing. The judgment addresses state immunity in relation to the breach of contract claim only; no substantive ruling on the unlawful deductions claim was made. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- s.1 State Immunity Act 1978
- Article 3 Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations
- Benkharbouche
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.