Case 2203577/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Gogolos v Herman-ze-German (in voluntary liquidation) — 2021
- Case reference
- 2203577/2021
- Decision date
- 26 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hopton Appearances
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Gogolos
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant began work for the respondent on 20 November 2017 as manager of its shop. His employment ended without notice on 7 October 2020 when the respondent went into voluntary liquidation. He brought claims for unpaid salary in March, September and part of October 2020, unpaid holiday pay, and notice pay. ACAS received the Early Conciliation notification on 28 May 2021 and the claim was presented on 3 June 2021.
The tribunal held that the claims for unlawful deduction from wages, holiday pay and breach of contract were all out of time and therefore dismissed. It noted the three-month time limits under section 23 ERA 1996 and section 7 of the Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England and Wales) Order 1994, and considered whether it was reasonably practicable for the claimant to have presented the claims within time. Although the claimant said this was his first redundancy, that he had no guidance and did not know the steps to take, the tribunal found he knew the respondent owed him money and knew a claim was possible, and that there were readily available internet sources about tribunal time limits.
The tribunal therefore concluded it was reasonably practicable for the claims to have been brought in time and dismissed them. The statutory redundancy payment claim under section 163 ERA 1996 was not determined at this hearing and was listed for a further hearing on 3 December 2021. The Secretary of State was treated as a party under Rule 96 because the claim may require a payment out of the National Insurance Fund.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Claim for notice pay dismissed as out of time; tribunal found it was reasonably practicable for the claimant to have presented it within the three-month limit. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim for unpaid salary in March, September and part of October 2020 dismissed as out of time; tribunal applied the three-month limit and found it was reasonably practicable to bring the claim in time. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Claim for unpaid holiday pay dismissed as out of time; tribunal found it was reasonably practicable for the claimant to have brought it within the relevant time limit. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
5 references- section 23 ERA 1996
- section 23(4) ERA 1996
- section 7 Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England and Wales) Order 1994
- reasonably practicable
- Rule 96 Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.