Case 2203579/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss O Adebowun v Nicole Powell trading as Lashesbyniic — 2020
- Case reference
- 2203579/2019
- Decision date
- 28 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Khan Representation
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss O Adebowun
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that the respondent made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages, contrary to section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. It recorded the deduction as £300 and ordered the respondent to pay that sum to the claimant within 28 days.
The judgment also states that the respondent’s counter-claim was dismissed. No separate breakdown of remedy components was given beyond the £300 award for the wages claim.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages contrary to section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 in the sum of £300 and ordered the respondent to pay that amount within 28 days. | Upheld | — | £300 |
| Other | The respondent's counter-claim was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £300
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.13 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.