Case 2203601/2019 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Not present or represented — 2020
- Case reference
- 2203601/2019
- Decision date
- 13 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wade Representation
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought claims of unfair dismissal, race discrimination and arrears of pay. The Tribunal recorded that he had brought previous claims concerning the same issues, including claims dismissed after full hearings and claims dismissed at preliminary hearings or Rule 27 hearings.
The Tribunal found that the current claim had no reasonable prospect of success for the reasons set out in the Rule 27 notice. Those reasons included that the same issues had already been litigated, the claims appeared to be barred by res judicata or abuse of process, the claims were out of time because the claimant's employment ended on 27 August 2015, and some matters raised, including personal injury and defamation, were outside the Tribunal's jurisdiction.
The Tribunal noted the claimant's submissions and his view that he had not been properly heard, but concluded that his arguments did not change the initial view. The claims were struck out under Rules 27 and 37.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The Tribunal held the claim was not permitted to proceed under Rules 27 and 37 because it had no reasonable prospect of success. | Struck out | — | — |
| Race discrimination | The Tribunal held the claim was not permitted to proceed under Rules 27 and 37 because it had no reasonable prospect of success. | Struck out | Race | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment described this as an arrears of pay claim. It was struck out with the other claims. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- Rules 27 and 37
- res judicata
- abuse of process
- time limits
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.